According to the 2000 Census What Percentage of the Nations Population Is Constituted by Immigrants

The U.S. Census Agency has just released its terminal batch of race-ethnic population estimates in advance of the 2020 census, with data indicating that the national headcount will reveal a more diverse nation than was previously expected. The new estimates prove that nearly four of x Americans place with a race or indigenous group other than white, and suggest that the 2010 to 2020 decade will be the first in the nation'south history in which the white population declined in numbers.

Over the decade's first nine years, racial and ethnic minorities deemed for all of the nation's population growth, and were responsible for population gains in many states, metropolitan areas, and counties that would have otherwise registered losses due to declines in their white populations. And while the U.Southward. and more than half of its states take shown absolute declines in populations nether age 25, such declines were largely due to white losses amongst the youth population. These declines would have been fifty-fifty greater were it not for youthful gains amongst racial and ethnic minorities, especially the Latino or Hispanic population.

A more diverse nation, especially among youths

The past several censuses have shown increased racial and ethnic diversity amid the U.S. population. In 1980, white residents comprised almost lxxx% of the national population, with Blackness residents accounting for xi.5%, Latino or Hispanic residents at 6.v%, and Asian Americans at 1.8%. (Except for Latinos or Hispanics, data for all racial groups pertain to non-Latino or Hispanic members of those groups.)

Past 2000, the Latino or Hispanic population showed a slightly higher share than the Black population: 12.6% versus 12.1%. The Asian American population share (including Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders) grew to iii.eight%, while the white population share dropped nearly ten percentage points, to 69.1%.

The new information shows that, by 2019, the white population share declined well-nigh nine more percentage points, to threescore.i%. The Latino or Hispanic and Asian American population shares showed the most marked gains, at eighteen.5% and most 6%, respectively. While these groups fluctuated over the past forty years, either up (for Latinos or Hispanics and Asian Americans) or downwardly (for whites), the Black share of the population remained relatively abiding.

The declining white population share is pervasive across the nation. Since 2010, the white population share declined in all fifty states (though not Washington, D.C.) (download table A), and in 358 of the nation'southward 364 metropolitan areas and three,012 of its 3,141 counties. Moreover, as of 2019, 27 of the 100 largest metropolitan areas have minority-white populations, including the major metropolises of New York, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Miami—also as Dallas, Atlanta, and Orlando, Fla., which reached this status by 2010 (download Table B).

Most noteworthy is the increased diversity in the younger portion of the population. In 2019, for the outset time, more than half of the nation's population under historic period sixteen identified as a racial or indigenous minority. Among this group, Latino or Hispanic and Blackness residents together contain nearly forty% of the population. Given the greater projected growth of all nonwhite racial minority groups compared to whites—along with their younger age construction—the racial diversity of the nation that was already forecasted to flow upward from the younger to older age groups looks to be accelerating.

A modest just unprecedented decline in the nation's white population

An important finding in the new demography data is the turn down of the nationwide white population for the third consecutive twelvemonth. Between 2016 and 2019, the white population declined from 197,845,666 to 197,309,822, in yearly amounts of -97,507, -212,957 and -225,380. This iii-year loss of over a one-half-million whites was enough to counter gains earlier in the decade, in total yielding a loss of white U.S. residents from 2010 to 2019.

Even this relatively small white population reject represents a significant demographic marker. Beginning, if the data is confirmed in the full 2020 census, the 2010 to 2020 decade would be the first decade since the beginning census was taken in 1790 when the white population did non grow. White population gains in recent decades accept grown smaller over time, from 11.2 million betwixt 1970 and 1980 down to 2.eight meg between 2000 and 2010. Just a white population loss between 2010 and 2020 would be unprecedented.

2d, the Census Agency was not projecting white population losses to occur until after 2024. This makes whatsoever national population growth fifty-fifty more than reliant on other race and ethnic groups.

The white demographic turn down is largely owing to its older age structure when compared to other race and indigenous groups. This leads to fewer births and more deaths relative to its population size. In 2019, the white median age was 43.7, compared to 29.viii for Latinos or Hispanics, 34.6 for Black residents, 37.5 for Asian Americans, and 20.9 for persons identifying equally two or more than races. The new census estimates show that, in dissimilarity to other groups, white Americans sustained a natural decrease (an excess of deaths over births) of ane,073,206 over the 2010 to 2019 period. The loss was partially attenuated by the net gain of 1,056,594 white immigrants.

While a white growth turn down could be predictable, information technology was accentuated in the past few years by a reduction of births among young adult white women (probable a delayed reaction to the Great Recession) and an uptick in deaths, perhaps associated with drug-related "deaths of despair." Also, every bit with other race-ethnic groups, white immigration to the U.Southward. recently slowed. Thus, the projected decline in the white population occurred 8 years before than demography projections predicted, contributing to the lower growth in the total U.S. population.

Race-ethnic minorities are responsible for all national growth

The unanticipated decline in the country's white population means that other racial and ethnic groups are responsible for generating overall growth. Nationally, the U.S. grew by nineteen.5 one thousand thousand people between 2010 and 2019—a growth rate of 6.three%. While the white population declined by a fraction of a pct, Latino or Hispanic, Asian American, and Black populations grew by rates of 20%, 29%, and 8.v%, respectively. The relatively small population of residents identifying every bit two or more races grew by a healthy 30%, and the smaller Native American population grew by 7.half-dozen%.

For most of these groups, natural increase was the primary correspondent to growth. Cyberspace immigration accounted for 74% of Asian American growth, but only 24% of Latino or Hispanic growth.

When translated into population totals, Latinos or Hispanics contributed 10 meg people—over one-half of the nation'due south 2010 to 2019 growth. Asian Americans, Blackness residents, and persons of ii or more races contributed four.five million, 3.ii meg, and ane.seven million people, respectively. These groups constituted the primary engines of the nation's growth, and are likely to do the aforementioned going forrad.

This is not simply the case nationally, but for many private areas inside the Usa equally well. While white population losses are not evident in all parts of the country, it is fairly pervasive, with the main exceptions being places that concenter white internal migrants. Between 2010 and 2019, 27 states and 47 of the 100 largest metropolitan areas showed white population losses. The areas with the largest white population gains were highly represented in the Lord's day Belt (download Tables C and D).

Despite losses in white populations, only four states and eight metropolitan areas experienced total population declines. In all of the other areas with white population losses, other race-indigenous groups more than made upwardly for the decline. Metropolitan Miami, for example, lost 120,000 whites over this period, but gained 600,000 people from other groups, peculiarly Latinos or Hispanics.

A broader view tin can be seen by looking at the nation'southward iii,100-plus counties. Amidst them, two,251 counties—home to nearly 60% of the nation'south residents—sustained losses in their white populations over the 2010 to 2019 menstruum. Yet, in 576 of those (where well over half of that population resides), white losses were more than countered by gains in racial and ethnic minority populations. These include an array of types of places (cities, suburbs, and rural areas) in all parts of the country. Especially represented are those that lie within major metropolitan areas, including New York, Los Angeles, Houston, Washington, D.C., and Miami.

A decline in the younger population, tempered by nonwhite gains

Another notable trend observed in the new census data is an overall decline in the nation's population under age 25. In a state that is quickly aging, an absolute decline in this youthful population represents a demographic challenge for the futurity.

A major reason for this decline lies in the fact that a good function of the aforementioned white population loss is concentrated among those nether historic period 25. Low fertility and an aging white adult population (with proportionately fewer women in changeable ages) reflects a long-term impediment to futurity white youth gains. In that location are two other factors contributing to this decline: a late-decade downturn in white clearing and the fact that the somewhat-larger generation of white millennials began "crumbling out" of this group, but to exist replaced by the smaller-sized Gen Z cohort.

To some extent, these factors also contributed to the small losses for Black and Native American populations nether age 25. All the same, these losses have been partially fabricated up for with gains in young populations of Latinos or Hispanics, Asian Americans, and persons of two or more than races.

The relative youth of the Latino and Hispanic population, in particular, contributes to higher levels of natural increase. Forth with Asian Americans, they likewise do good from immigration. Hence, the 5.3 1000000-person decline for white, Blackness, and Native American populations under historic period 25 this decade was reduced to a net ane.6 million loss due to the positive contributions of Latinos or Hispanics, Asian Americans, and persons identifying as two or more races.

The national white decline in the nether-25 population likewise impacts states and other areas. Since 2010, 29 states sustained losses in this young population, led by California, New York, and Illinois. Each of these states lost young whites and were non able to counter those losses with gains from other groups (download Table E). In 17 additional states, including Texas and Florida, other racial and ethnic groups were able overtake white losses to yield total gains in their young adult populations. Only four states—Utah, North Dakota, Idaho, and South Carolina—showed a proceeds in white young people over the 2010 to 2019 catamenia. Going forrard, growth in America's youth will become increasingly dependent on nonwhite minority contributions.

Diversity and America's future

As I take written previously, racial and ethnic diversity will be an essential ingredient of America's futurity. The mostly white baby boomer culture that defined the concluding one-half of the 20th century is giving fashion to a more multihued, multicultural nation. The demographic underpinnings for this take been gear up in place for a while, just the new census information places an exclamation betoken on them. Information technology suggests that past projections of increased racial and indigenous multifariousness may accept been too cautious given the accelerated aging and pass up of the white population. Nosotros volition know more when the full 2020 demography results are released next year.

I fact is already clear: As the nation becomes fifty-fifty more racially diverse from the "bottom up" of the historic period structure, more than attention needs to be given to the needs and opportunities for America's highly various younger generations. The demography alone dictates that this will be necessary to ensure success for these youth and the nation as a whole.

flowersonsould.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.brookings.edu/research/new-census-data-shows-the-nation-is-diversifying-even-faster-than-predicted/

Share this post